The toga was the defining garment of
the male Roman citizen, and Romans prided themselves on
being the gens togata, ‘the race that wears the
toga’. The most informative ancient source on the shape and
arrangement of the toga is a section in Quintilian’s
Education of an Orator (Institutio oratoria
11.3.139-48), which we supplement with the evidence of
statues, reliefs, and paintings.
Much remains uncertain, however, due as much to changing
fashions and personal styles over the centuries as to the
vagueness of our sources on important matters that in
antiquity were taken for granted.
The toga used for the UCLA performance was modeled on fig.
16, “Large Toga of the Republican Period”, in the standard
reference, Louise Wilson’s The Roman Toga
(Baltimore, 1924), p. 121. Our toga measures approximately
8 ft. by 16 ft. The tunic worn underneath is rectangular in
shape, with neck and arm openings and without added
sleeves. It is 3ft. 4in. wide and 3 ft 8 in. long. Since
the toga has a senatorial stripe, the tunic underneath is
not cinched (Quint. Inst. Or. 11.3.138).
This toga was planned and constructed by Karen Gunterman, a
doctoral candidate in the Department of Classics, who is
currently writing a dissertation on Herodotus’ ideas about
language. Before returning to the academic world, however,
she worked as a patternmaker in the garment industry.
Making the toga provided an opportunity to apply this
experience to her interests as a classicist.
Finding suitable material for such a garment in the modern
marketplace can be difficult. Ms. Gunterman explains her
procedure as follows:
‘Even allowing for a sculptor’s stylization of the folds, I
believe the surviving statues of togate figures reflect the
soft drape of the loosely woven cloth from which togas were
made. I therefore looked for a fabric that would drape as
do the togas on these sculptures.
The way the toga hangs on the sculpture affects our sense
of the fullness of the fabric, and this in turn is the
basis of judgments about the amount of fabric used and the
shape of the garment. As a starting point for evaluating
current arguments about the shape and construction of the
toga, I sought to reproduce the drape in my toga. To this
end, I used a wool blend crepe, which falls much like the
light weight woolen fabric I would have preferred but could
not find. I pieced the toga with vertical seams at the
selvages so that the warp threads hang in the same
direction as in the hand-woven originals. The purple border
is attached as an extension of the toga to avoid doubling
the thickness of the fabric. The stripes on the tunic would
have been woven into the fabric of the Roman originals, but
here they are set in. I used a sewing machine to join the
seams and to finish the hems, but given the direction of
the seams, I don’t think this greatly affects the hang of
the garment. When properly arranged on a model, this
finished toga seems to me to satisfactorily resemble the
statues of the late Republican period.’
For Further Reading:
A. T. Croom. 2000. Roman Clothing and Fashion.
Charleston S. C.: Tempus. Pp. 18-29 (Chapter 2 'Cloths and
colour').
Hans Rupprecht Goette. 1990.
Studien zu Römischen Togadarstellungen. Mainz: Zabern.
Norma Goldman. 1994. 'Reconstructing Roman Clothing' in J.
L. Sebesta and L. Bonfante, eds. The World of Roman
Costume. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin. Press.
Pp. 213-237.
H. Granger-Taylor. 1982. 'Weaving
Clothes to Shape in the Ancient World: The Tunic and Toga
of the Arringatore.' Textile History 13: 3-25.
Walter O. Moeller. 1976. The
Wool Trade of Ancient Pompeii Leiden. |